The latest Bitcoin rebound has pushed the BTC price back above $84,000, recovering from this month’s dip to $74,000 and logging a solid 10% weekly gain. While this move has stirred optimism among investors, it hasn’t completely convinced analysts watching the current market trend. The big question on everyone’s mind: Is this the start of a proper comeback or just a short break in a more prolonged downturn?
New signals from on-chain data are starting to offer some insight. CryptoQuant contributor Kripto Mevsimi points to a recovery in Bitcoin’s “Apparent Demand” metric, especially the 30-day sum, which is climbing back from hostile territory. It’s a potentially bullish sign that buyers are slowly returning. Still, Mevsimi cautions that the recent rebound hasn’t fully confirmed a reversal, drawing comparisons to 2021, when similar signs fizzled out and the BTC price stagnated in a long consolidation phase.
Adding to the cautiously optimistic outlook is a steady decline in Bitcoin inflows from short-term holders on Binance. According to analyst Darkfost, these inflows have dropped from 17,000 BTC in November to around 9,000 BTC now. With less selling pressure, there’s potential for price stability. However, whether this marks the start of accumulation or just a pause is still unclear. As the Bitcoin rebound gains attention, eyes are on the charts to see if the BTC market trend is truly turning a corner.
In response to the backlash, Mantra co-founder John Mullin attempted to clarify the situation. He claimed that the crash was triggered by “forced closures” on certain exchanges during a period of extremely low liquidity, not insider manipulation.
However, his statement did little to calm investor fears. Many remain convinced that the events surrounding OM’s rise and fall were too calculated to be coincidental. Crypto trader Duo Nine suggested that either a rogue market maker or an insider triggered a sell-off far exceeding available liquidity.
Cryptocurrencies fall under Inland Revenue Board Malaysia (IRBM or LHDN) management through the Income Tax Act 1967 (ITA). The government regulates cryptocurrencies only as possession items and not as official money. IRBM relies on a “badges of trade” framework to figure out whether crypto activities are investment (non-taxable) or trading (taxable). Cryptocurrencies are not considered as currency by Bank Negara Malaysia and the Securities Commission Malaysia but as investment assets. As of now, there are no crypto-specific tax laws but general tax principles continue to apply to crypto transactions.
Crypto trading losses can only offset profits from trading, not other income types. Capital losses from investments are not deductible, as capital gains are not taxed. For businesses, allowable deductions include expenses directly incurred for generating income, like trading fees and platform costs. General business tax incentives may apply if criteria under the ITA are met.
The IRBM monitors crypto activity through data-sharing with licensed exchanges like Luno, MX Global, Tokenize Technology, and SINEGY. It also uses blockchain analytics tools to trace wallet addresses and transaction history. In 2020, Luno’s account was frozen during a tax investigation, reflecting the seriousness of enforcement.
Malaysia’s tax system for crypto is still evolving. While it currently offers favorable treatment for long-term investors, the IRBM may introduce clearer rules or new tax measures. While the government is open to digital innovation and blockchain, they are also slowly becoming stricter with reporting requirements and new obligations for both individuals and businesses.
The taxation in Malaysia is focused on the earnings from trading, mining, or staking of crypto, which are taxable as income, while capital gains from crypto are tax-free. It is important to keep records and report in a timely manner. Compliance is a way for taxpayers who want to stay on the right side of LHDN’s regulations and be granted safe by legal risks. Seeking professional advice in order to catch up with crypto tax obligation changes in policy might be favorable.
The latest behavior of the market shows that ADA has witnessed a buying pressure surge. A crossover above the 20-day EMA tends to show that bulls are taking over and that the asset may be entering a new uptrend. This is supported in the case of Cardano by the apparent build-up of short-term bullish momentum.
A violation of this technical level would not only confirm the bullish reversal but also bring in additional traders and investors who use technical signals for entry points.
Underpinning the technical view are fundamental on-chain indicators. As per blockchain analytics portal Santiment, Cardano’s Network Realized Profit/Loss (NPL) has gone negative of late. This indicator detects if present holders are in profit or loss depending on the last moving price of their tokens.
A negative NPL indicates that the majority of ADA holders are at a loss right now. In the past, this deters additional selling, as investors sit on assets to not lock in losses. This tendency results in less supply on the market, tightening the available tokens and potentially forcing prices upward.
Another bullish signal comes from Cardano’s Chaikin Money Flow (CMF), a volume-weighted indicator that tracks capital inflows and outflows. Currently, the CMF sits at 0.04, which indicates that more money is flowing into ADA than out of it.
A positive CMF reinforces the view that investors are accumulating the token rather than selling, a critical factor that supports continued upward momentum. This indicator suggests that the recent rally is supported by genuine investor interest and not just short-term speculation.
Post a Comment